Saga of Entrepreneurship

Some fifty years back, the organization wanted their people to obey their orders, they want their employees to think but not to outthink their bosses. They typically did not like if the questions were asked and they liked to get only answers and most importantly the answers that are liked by them. When the world economy is in recession and more Gen Y get into the organizations, these leaders are overwhelmed by the number of questions asked at them and the people seem to be "egoistic". Few years from now, there will a substantial change in the way we work. Even today, the way we work is changing - the concept of "managers" is slowly replaced by the concept of "entrepreneurship". The organization no longer like to have managers who can only do "managing stuff". They like to have people who can take risk, who go an extra mile simply to explore and interested in the learning.

When you are a manager, you will think within a boundary but when you are entrepreneur you think without a boundary and your boundary is the horizon. The organizations have become risk appetite in terms of investment and returns. Now, they are trying to change their employees' thought process and attitude. The word "work" is often replaced by the word "business". I believe, the word "entrepreneur" nowadays not only applies to people who start their own venture but also to people who work for organization and take risks. The word is not used in its real meaning but as quality or way of doing something.

So, moving forward, we will be seeing more of entrepreneurial spirits in the organization and I believe that will innovation in management or next level in management evolution.

Human Brain - Reversed

I worked in Network security and the interest towards security led me to read about application security and reverse engineering. Reading reverse engineering is exciting and reversing a software is a great experience. Reversing a software is no means a small thing but even multiple times harder is to reverse a complex system - the brain simply because "software" is created by man but "brain" is not created by man (though human is responsible for creating a race, no one yet has created a fully functional brain and it is nearly impossible). The brain, weighing roughly three pounds has a lot of mystery. The scientists are trying to figure out the potential of brain and most important try to reverse the brain.

At one side, the biologists are trying to study brain as neural circuitry and another front scientists are also studying brain to improve relationship, leadership and emotional intelligence. The study of brain will help us to understand how the brain works and most importantly how the brain learns. This will help us to properly educate the kids and grown ups. I believe the study of human brain and understanding it will be more challenging and rewarding as well. John Medina, in his book, Brain Rules, says that the human beings are smarter rather than being stronger and the history of human evolution also proves that we are smarter and hence study of human brain is very important and it can lead us to next level in human evolution.

Survive in Hard Time - Connect with your people

Assume the following scenario in 22-Apr-2009. "We are now in tough times and this is the right time for us to optimize and so we are going with cost cutting. We cannot afford to be complacent and we will emerge strong post recession. The time we invest, the strategy we chalk out and its execution will decide whether we will emerge stronger". Just fast forward your time machine. Can you guess what they will say once they economy recovers (and if they exist).

You are in 22-Apr-2012 and again you hear the same voice. "We emerged strong, we did something which is innovative and it made us to be here. We are ahead of the competition". I believe, most of the corporates, if not all of them, will be on top of the world and beat drums that their strategy worked. In a real sense? No, says many professors at famous business schools. They say that most organizations ride the waves because of either of two things - Co-incidence or luck. They just happened to be there with probably a strong balance sheets, they were able to withstand the recession and as expected post recession, the economy booms and they start to build their balance sheet again. Their profits erode in recession and booms when the economy comes to normalcy. This is how most corporates work.

Then what the heck that this strategy does. Why often leaders confuse their people about strategy. Why dont they be meaningful? How to thrive well in recession. It is fairly simple, "deliver more for less". How can you make it? Just connect with you people and make them understand your perspective. The employees may think that why the hell he/she needs to deliver "more for less" unless one gives the perspective. It is imperative that leaders, irrespective your designation, interact with people (not just CEO, VPs). Connecting is quite different from forwarding emails, connecting is quite different from a monologue. When you try to connect with people, the first thing you got to do is understand their problems, respect their opinions, reject their opinions with due dignity and above all have guts to take blame and do not shy away.

One thing that managers keep telling their people is communication and bringing up the issue at right time and with due sensitivity. Isn't it not important to connect with people when their morale is down or when their life is at stake? It makes sense even in good times but it makes more sense in difficult times.

When you do that, your people will automatically deliver more and you will also leave a legacy.

Intellectual Curiosity - Questions Matter !

Intellectual curiosity is the one of the factors that tells whether we are moving in right track. If you look at great people, they always asked good questions and the guys who answer the questions were average guys. It takes a great deal to ask sensible questions than answering some ordinary questions :-). For example, many scientists were ousted from schools because their teachers thought that they were asking non sense questions. But those teachers failed to understand that the very same curiosity later drove them to learn more things and to see things differently. I feel that answering a question is pretty easier when compared with asking relevant, meaningful, thought provoking questions. Though a child is immature, everyone wants to be like a child and everyone prescribe others to be like a child. Curiosity makes the different, isn't it?

Sometime back, I hovered over Internet and landed on the website of Jim Collins and read his biography. After a while, I was reading "The Greatness Guide" by Robin Sharma in which he emphasized the importance of being "under construction". When I reflected the words of these great people, I felt that there was a great advantage in being a life long student constantly looking out of opportunities to learn the knowledge and unlearn the ignorance. This is an wonderful state of being and signifies the growth of any person. Awareness follows thinking, awareness gives us intelligence and intelligence helps us to find answers for those complex questions. Only when you ask questions, you understanding expands and that shows that you are moving in right track.

So ask questions, don't bother if you don't answers, but eventually you will find it. Any thoughts?

Decision Making, System Thinking, Scenario Planning

I have been reading the book on system thinking by Gerald Weinberg rather slowly. I have not read more than first few pages and even the first few pages opens up a lot of opportunities for thinking. It makes me to think a lot. I try to apply system thinking theoritically to many aspect of my life. I feel system thinking is a natural thinking. I understand, we, the human being have the capability to be a system thinker. It is purely our fault of not realizing our ability and we prove that "The fish is the last one to see the water". As well pointed out by Gerald Weinberg, the rapid industrialization brought in wealth but hazardous second order effects of pollution and global warming. The rapid development of crops have produced good amount of harvest but gave us inorganic food leading to genetic effects. While the fast paced world is focussing on the first order results, it fails to observe and act on the second and third order effects. This gives us enough evidences that we are not learning from our mistakes and failing to correct ourselves. I strongly believe that when the decision making is good, all the other things will be good. Recently, I have read a short write up about scenario planning or scenario based decision making and how it helps in making wise decisions. I feel that scenario planning is subset of system thinking. Here is my view on both system thinking and scenario planning. Read on.

Amidst the unprecedented recession of our generation, no one will deny that we are witnessing the second order effects high leverage and heavy risk appetite and the first order effects of a systemic failure. No one would have thought that they are merely betting on something which is overvalued multiple times or on things that does not exist at all. I am not sure whether we will learn anything from this recession. I don't deny the fact that some organizations will be creating a document or at best will be writing a software to protect themselves from a failure. However, I seriously doubt whether we, as a human being, will come up with a learning which we can apply the lessons learnt to some other problems and use them for better decision making. I doubt because we fail to appreciate the importance of system thinking and only the system thinkers can stop such failures.

The effects that we consider second order are the effects that are not thought about. The world does not even care about the second order effects and goes to an extent of not giving importance to be aware of those second order effects. But these second order effects reaches a tipping point and becomes much severe. Only then the world realizes its significance like the recent recession. If you want to explain with a real world example, who thought that poverty will to lead emergence of terrorism (I am taking about Naxal in India) . The terrorists are the second order effects of poverty. If you want to fix terrorism, fix the first order effects that is exploiting people and poverty. So, the system thinking should play a pivotal role in any decision making process may it be at policy level or at strategy level. First criteria for a decision maker is to be a system thinker.

The next thing that will be cropping up in upcoming months is the concept of Scenario Planning. I believe the system thinkers and scenario planning experts are likely to play a very crucial role in building a modern society. Scenario planning is a kind of analysis where the future is built and the study will be made on the impact of the decisions in that future. For example, if you are taking a home loan from a bank, the banks will consider what will happen if the person loses the job, what will happen when the land values drops. I believe, when the entire world is newly build and modern economy emerges, the scenario analysis together will system thinking will play a crucial role in making wise decisions. I would like to see a world that thinks. It is the thinking that will bring prosperity not just investments. :-)

Unix Programming - Understanding a simple "C" Program

Post 3

We saw that a program is a passive entity which is sequence of instructions. The sequence of instructions implements a specific algorithm or logic for doing specific operations. Another important aspect of writing a program is segregating the program logic into logical chucks as functions. These functions make program modular so that the program can be easily understood. The program also consists of data and the primary aim of any program is to process the data and produce useful information. There may be different types of data required throughout the process execution. Some data might be required for the entire life of the process and some data may needed only for certain period of time. Each of the process has an address space and the data is stored in process address space. The data is referred by the code (instructions) using variables. Based on the nature of the data whether it required throughout the program or only shorter span of time in a function the variables can be classified into two main types - local and global. Let us discuss about various types of variables with the help of simple example. This understanding is very much essential before discussing process address space.

#include

int COUNT = 0;

void simplefunction(int c, int d)

{

printf("%d, %d", c, d);

}

int main()

{

int a = 1;

int b = 2;

simplefunction(a, b);

return 0;

}

In the above example, we have a variable with name "COUNT". There are two functions "main" and "simplefunction" each two variables. The variables "a", "b", "c" and "d" are called as local variable as their access is restricted the respective functions and the variable "COUNT" is called global variable as the access to global variable is available to all function. The local variables are also called as stack variables. The local variables have shorter life span and global variables exists throughout the life of the entire process. When a process is loaded in to the memory, these variables are stored in a specific region in the process address space, some of them are created when the process starts and some of them are created as and when they are executed and freed as soon as they go out of scope (that is whenever they are not needed).

In the next post, we will discuss about how a process is loaded into the memory, various regions in process address space and how a process is executed.

Unix Programming - Getting the executable

Post 2

So, you now know what is a process from a layman's view. Process is a live entity which has some mission to be completed and it has some input and output resources and does some computing. These processes are run in computers. If you see the computers right from 1980s, there are many types of computers like super computers, desktop personal computers, laptops and even you have decent amout of computing being done in mobile devices. In all these devices, there are at least handful of processes to tens of thousands of processes running at the same time. If you look at these devices, they are quite different in application and quite different in assembling. For example, your desktop computer may have many hardware components including processor which does the computing. The way the computation is done may vary from processor to processor. So, each processor comes up with a way of getting things done. Each processor will have specific set of instructions, often referred as instruction set, using which the computation can be done.

Assume a scenario like this, you are writing a software that takes a year's time to write but you want that software to be run in most devices. For example, let us assume that you are much concerned about time management and you are writing a simple daily planner. Isn't it reasonable if you want it to be run in your desktop, mobile and even super computer? But if you write a software using instruction set of a specific processor, your software will not work in other devices which has different processor. In order to overcome this, computer scientist came with the concept of high languages like C and C++. These high level languages have specific syntax often expressed using English, special characters and scientific notations. A special software, compiler or interpreter, is used to convert the code written in high level language to machine language. So, now you have moved from writing software for specific device to writing software for whole bunch of devices and using compilers/interpreters to actually generate machine instructions from your high level language.

When you write a program in high level language, it cannot be directly run on your computer. As a first step, you have to compile it, link it and load it. We have seen what is compilation. But what really is linking? In your software, you will do some commonly used operations such as getting input from the user, reading a file, writing to a file and displaying output to the user. What you do with the input and how you process the input to produce output may vary from program to program but all the programs tend to have certain common denominator. Rather than writing code for this common denominator for each software you write, does it sound good to write the common code once and keep it for lifetime. Yes, it is in fact a brillant idea and the common code is called library. When you are writing software you will be quite often referring this common library. For example, in our "Hello, World", printf is a library function that outputs to standard output. Don't bother if you do not get what is standard output. We will uncover that in future. Time being, assume that it is your display. The concept of attaching your code with the common library is called linking. Only after compiling and linking, your code becomes fully functional and ready to be run. We call it as "binary" or "executable" or "exe".

So far, we have prepared a program and not yet executed it which is equall exciting if not more exciting. In the next post, we will again discuss about a simple program little bit deeper. I assure you, before end of next week, I will tell you about process address space :-). I feel that it is very important to know these details so as to get deeper understanding. I just don't want to 100th text book and 100001th webpage. I believe in quality rather than quantity and quantity makes sense when there is quality. Hope you agree with me.

Catch you later

Why should I understand Unix?

Clear: Hey dude, how are you doing?

Confused: I am doing fine, just thinking about some stuff.

Clear: What's that?

Confused: Unix...

Clear: Preety cool, I m learning it. It is interesting piece of marvelous

Confused: But my friend once said, it is difficult to understand

Clear: Any new thing is difficult to understand.. remember you had difficult times in understanding me, weren't you :-)

Confused: Yep :-). So what do you say abt Unix?

Clear: Unix is simple and an example on how to write a software. By reading Unix, you not only understand Unix but also how to write better software.

Confused: Thats interesting. I never thought something like this..

Clear: There many operating systems that follow Unix. You have so many Unix OSes and Linux too.

Confused: I thought Unix and Linux are different

Clear: They are different. But the design concepts are almost same.

Confused: Ok, I think, now, I m getting clear. how to read it.. any idea?

Clear: Yep, start reading Unix about half-page daily, digest it, 

Confused: Half a page, interesting. I used to read entire book over a weekend....

Clear: Novel? It isn't a novel. So you have to digest the concepts to deepen your understanding. do as little as half a page. It ll take years to be overnight success in Unix :-)

Confused: Yep, I understand the need for consistency and daily improvements. Sounds good. let me do it

Clear:  Great...all the best...

Confused (now clear): Thanks buddy for great piece of suggestion. talk to you later. HAND

Clear: you too.

How to Build Emotional Intelligence?

You might have seen how a short tempered and ill tempered behave with lot of emotions. Irrespective of whether your emotional intelligence is high or low, everyone's reaction to a situation will be spontaneous and natural. If you happen to possess low emotional intelligence you will certainly overdo things at an emotional level and hence you may be perceived as "immature" guy. If you look the scenario and how your brain processes these behaviors, you will agree that you cannot be look emotionally good if you aren't really emotionally good. If you do, then your action will not be natural and people will see that you are acting. This perception is quite dangerous than perceived as ill-tempered guy. For others, it is absolutely essential that you appear as authentic guy (again, it is not hard and fast rule that you should appear authentic. Anyway, the world is willing to deal only with authentic. You decide). So acting like a good tempered guy is not the way how you should improve your emotional intelligence. How can you improve? Here is my personal experience on how I am improving my emotional intelligence.

Our brain, which weight roughly three pounds has thousands of miles of cells and still the scientists are figuring out from where the decision is coming from exactly. For each thing that comes out of you, need to be approved by the gatekeeper – the brain. The scientists are moderately successful in studying brain cells and also as components. But the research is still on to study brain as neural circuitry. The study will reveal how, we, the human beings process the information. I am looking for some research results about emotional intelligence. However, I do not want to wait until the results are published and want to do the experiment on my own which is generally the hard way. For the first time, I want to be a monkey or rat in my own lab to improve my emotional intelligence.

One of the things that I found recently is that one cannot improve emotional intelligence by going opposite to your emotions. For example, when you are hungry you just need the food. When you are angry, you need to vent it out, when you are happy, you got to hug your friend. So, I do not believe in the concept of counting numbers or biting nails or whatever. When you do that, your emotions simply takes another form. But my point about emotional intelligence is ability to stand on your opinion and yet considering the perspective of others without taking any sidelines.

The emotions are building blocks of human relationship and certainly when you overdo certain emotions, it becomes an issue. As long as you are not stepping out and overdoing things, it is not a problem. But, in case, you are overdoing it, you need to be little careful in getting your thoughts across and check with others how you interacted with them. This can simply be done by making a third person (your friend or well wisher) to watch you when you react and give you feedback. In worst case, you can record your reaction in a video/audio and analyze yourself. This is the first step – capturing the data. This data should show you some evidence whether you need reconstruction.

The next step is to accept your current state and work on improving yourself. The first step, identifying your emotional intelligence, will be easier. But accepting it is very difficult as you have to convince your ego that you are not good and needs improvement. There is a difference between someone telling you that you are bad and you thinking that you are bad. If someone tells you that "you are bad", it is not end of world. But when you start to think that you are bad, you may end in getting inferiority complex and eaten up by low confidence. So, it is highly important that you do not lose "SELF" but yet work on it. So, always think about so many good things you have and work on those traits that need improvement. This is where your friend or well wisher can help you to sail through by giving those crucial feedbacks and also appreciate and cheer you up. If you can work on improving your emotions to other's emotions, it will be great not only in professional career but also at personal life.

If you are thinking that you can improve your emotional intelligence by not reacting to others, it is wrong. You cannot improve emotional intelligence by looking at others or by just reading books. It has to be an experience because you need train your brain and the neurons in the brain when you want the change to be ever lasting. It is like archery, swimming and life. You got to live and learn with it. But if you are satisfied with temporary solution, you can tell your brain to do “the acting” (which again is not good for you). It is the time and efforts that will help you to improve your emotional intelligence, not books, not case studies, not training. I have tried this approach and it works very slowly. I believe that this is the only way how one can build emotional intelligence and any other short cuts do not work at all. It might be slow, but it is effective and ever lasting.

So, sounds good? Have any thoughts?

Other posts on Emotional Intelligence can be accessed via this link

PS: If you want to here from a subject matter expert about Emotional Intelligence, refer the works of Daniel Goleman. He is authority in EI.

Unix Programming - What is Process?

Post 1

Today, we have so many programming languages and many software that have been created with those programming languages. It is surprising to see that an operating system design is still scaling from mini devices such as watches, washing machines to super computers and clusters. KISS, stands for Keep It Simple and Stupid, an acronymn given any piece of software that does one thing and does it well. It is not overstatement if I say Unix is a cornerstone in computing. There has been so many software that were produced but yet it is difficult to find one something like Unix. Unix is such a marvelous creation like the ones of Bethoven, Michaelanglo. The concept of Unix is simple - Process have life and files have space. Many operating systems have cloned the concept and design philosophies of Unix. If your Unix/Linux system is doing something, it should be combination of Processes and Files. In this post and few (not sure how many) subsequent posts, we will discussing more on Unix/Linux programming concepts  predominantly from user space and from kernel space as and when it is required. My intention is not cover the entire stuff in a single post, but rather I want to be consistent in posting short post. I feel, it is gives a sense of accomplishment to interested readers after reading few posts. It also gives better retaintivity as you can come back to short posts and quickly go through it which improves your short term memory. Without wasting much time, let us get into action.

What is a process? A process is a live entity, it is a program under execution. But when you generalize with such as definition, we tend to forget what really is a process. This may be an answer that you can give in an interview but not when you are trying to understand the system. It is the processes that move the system. Apart from being a program under execution, what is the process? A process is a black box that takes input, processes it and produces the output. It is an algorithm or group of algorithms that is running on the computer. When you say "taking input", what sort of inputs does it take? The input can be a data from a memory location, a stream of bytes from hard disk or network hosts, a signal from its fellow process or its parent and the input resources can be of any form. So, now you know that you need input. The next thing is how do you intend to operate on the input data. Apart from input resources, you also need a logic (code or machine instruction) that processes the data. Until now we have seen data received from input resources and code that processes the data both requiring some space. After you manipulate the data, you need store the data to a output resource or device. But generally, computing is not that simple. Before storing it to output device, you may need to have so many intermediate stages as a part of your algorithm. When you connect these things, you will get the process. A process is not just a program under execution but much more than that. A process is live entity that has address space, context, input resources (open files, database connection, sockets) and output resources (open files, database connection and sockets), state and so many other things in user space and as well as in kernel space. Not only user space, the process has also something in kernel space like per process area and data structures to access the input/output resources. Everything put togother is a process. It is not just code, it is much more than that.

Assume that you have given a billion dollar to answer this question. If you know "C" programming language or if you do not know "C" you can take any programming language. Can you give me a write up (you can to the comments section) on how the following program is executed in a Unix/Linux system. If you answer this question, I believe the size does not matter. You can work on super computers or high performance clusters. Here you go.

int main()

{

    char *str = "Hello, World";

    printf("%s", str);

    return 0;

}

In the next post, we will be discussing how this program is loaded into the memory and how the address space of this process is going to look like and then slowly move on to how this process is executed, how "Hello, World" is printed.

Catch you later.

Emma - Java Code Coverage Made Easy (Part 3)

Before reading this post, I would suggest the readers to go through the previous posts (Part 1and Part 2) for better understanding even though this post alone can be of use but when combined with other previous will help you to understand the whole context of code coverage. In the first post, we understood the importance of code coverage and the second post talked about Emma's on-the-fly instrumentation. Before dealing with other possible ways of using Emma, in this post, I would like to give an overview about Emma. The intention of having previous posts is to help someone to get off the ground and this post will help to understand Emma. This post will be predominantly theoretical (which is very much needed to understand how tools are written for Java in general and how Emma is implemented in particular). With the information given in this post, you will be able to come to decision on how to use Emma effectively.

In the world of Java, you can write tools in whichever way you want. However, Java gives you at least two standard way of writing tools. These are defined as specification. The first method is something to do with "monitoring and managing" runtime behavior. Java Platform Debug Architecture, Java Debug Wire Protocol, Java Virtual Machine Tool Interface and Java Debug Interface primarily do "runtime monitoring and managing". The concept can be put simply put as "watching what JVM does and taking actions based on JVM behavior". The tool should listen what JVM is doing through events and write logic - what the tool intended to do. The main disadvantage of this is approach is the overhead in receiving the events and processing the events.

Another standard way is to add the logic to the class files. Let us consider code coverage. The objective of any code coverage tool is to measure the coverage line by line. In order to do this, the coverage tool injects the code coverage logic in all class files. Whenever the class is loaded and executed, along with the application logic, the code coverage logic also runs and records the coverage metrics. This is called as bytecode instrumentation. Again, there are two ways of doing this. First is to modify the application class in the hard disk (or any secondary storage) and the second method is add the bytecode on-the-fly when the classes are loaded.

Emma exploits both the methods and hence it lets users to measure the code coverage both offline instrumentation and on-the-fly instrumentation. The caveat is that during the on-the-fly and offline, the way the application is measured for coverage is not going to vary. Only the method used to inject or instrument bytecodes is going to vary (which we described already).

Emma employs on-the-fly instrumentation if you have integrated Emma with IDEs. The command line version of Emma has the capability to run both in offline and on-the-fly instrumentation mode. Most of the times, the developers/testers use on-the-fly instrumentation since the risk of changing the application classes is not there as bytecode instrumentation happens on-the-fly. But the life is not easy as it seems. When you are using certain application servers or servlet container, you cannot use on-the-fly because the application servers/servlet containers have custom classloaders. Here offline instrumentation is the only option. So, before using Emma, you may need to study little bit about your application and use the suitable methods.

I have also come up with a little interactive presentation with flash using Wink on Emma. It can be accessed through this link